The following letter was published in The Australian Financial Review on 12 October 2009. I reproduce it here for your enjoyment.
In your "Radical plan to guarantee energy supply" (October 9), much was made of the Australian Energy Market Commission’s recommendation to support greater flexibility in retail energy pricing.
Energy retailers praised the move arguing that the additional flexibility proposed by the AEMC should be seen “as a minimum”.
There was no coverage, however, of the fact that the AEMC emphasised the need for best-practice consumer protections as an important safeguard in a retail market characterised by rising prices under the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme and a more flexible price setting mechanism.
Victoria, the nation’s most competitive energy market with the most flexible price setting arrangements, provides a good model for the national consumer protection regime currently being considered by the ministerial council on energy.